| Author |
Message |
|
Cybertech44
|
Post subject: Xp vs Vista vs 7  Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:27 am |
|
 |
| Pro Member |
 |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 2:33 am
Posts: 62
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
|
|
What do you guys think of these Windows Operating Systems, which is better and why?
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
nox
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:10 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 12:34 am
Posts: 144
Location: NC
|
|
7 > XP > Vista
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cybertech44
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:13 am |
|
|
| Pro Member |
|
|
|
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 2:33 am
Posts: 62
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lhatcher
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:02 am |
|
|
| Senior Moderator |
 |
|
|
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 11:03 pm
Posts: 872
Location: Prosper, TX
|
nox wrote: 7 > XP > Vista I agree with this. 7 is the best OS windows has released, in my opinion.
_________________
I can help with the following languages: Java, HTML, CSS, PHP, ASP, SQL. I love to help out, just make sure you've searched google for an answer first!
Q: Why did the functions stop calling each other?
A: Because they had constant arguments.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
wing
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:10 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:30 pm
Posts: 109
|
|
I would recommend 7 because they based it off XP. And well, then there's vista...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Newnumide
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:41 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:44 pm
Posts: 80
Location: ⵏⴻⴽ ⴷ ⴰⵇⴱⴰⵢⵍⵊ(ⵣ)
|
|
i bought 2 windows 7 Ultimate for 96 $US each with guenine key(not OEM copies or upgrades and new)
thats crazy man
i installed the the 64bit v and i upgraded my RAM to 4.5GB.
i ran a game that i used to play on vista....and i was surprised the game was smoother in vista then w7.
i didnt understandwhy. may be i need more RAM?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Holiverh
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:14 am |
|
|
| Expert Poster |
 |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:01 am
Posts: 124
Location: East Anglia, UK
|
Newnumide wrote: may be i need more RAM? More RAM is always the answer!   4.5GB of memory should be more than enough to run Windows 7, background processes and any game. There could be a couple of possible causes for decrease in performance. Firstly, check the game's configuration. Turn off/down any settings that aren't necessary. If no improvement is noted there is likely a bottle-neck in your system. If you've changed any hardware recently you may have introduced the bottle-neck then. How you resolve that would be totally at your discretion. They are only two possibilities, it could be something more sophisticated.
_________________
Salus populi suprema lex esto.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nox
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:48 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 12:34 am
Posts: 144
Location: NC
|
|
Everything runs better for me with Win7. I have 6 gigs of RAM though.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sh0x
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:39 pm |
|
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:52 am
Posts: 1125
Location: Munich
|
|
4.5GB ram is bad, because its neither dual channel nor tripple channel then
4GB dual channel works faster than your 4.5GB
if you have a mainboard for dual channel, make sure you put an equal amount of ram in the slots that are linked (most likely they have the same color)
so the stuff you can put in there is:
2x1GB = 2GB, 2x2GB=4GB, 2x4GB=8GB, 2x8GB=16GB etc etc.. to make it run in dual channel mode
tripple channel is mostly on mainboards for intel core i5/i7
3x1GB = 3GB, 3x2GB=6GB, 3x4GB=12GB, 3x8GB=24GB etc etc.. to make it run in tripple channel mode
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WASD
|
Post subject: Re: Xp vs Vista vs 7 Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:14 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:28 pm
Posts: 60
Location: Sweden
|
|
I've been using XP forever and have no plans on changing. It's simply a matter of taste, no OS is better then any other.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
